California Correctional Lieutenant Practice Exam

If a father hits his 17-year-old son for breaking curfew, is this an act of domestic violence?

1. No, that's a parental discipline

2. Yes, because it involves physical assault

3. It depends on the severity of the hit

4. No, since the son is a minor

The correct answer is: Yes, because it involves physical assault

The scenario presented involves a father physically hitting his son, which qualifies as an act of domestic violence. Domestic violence encompasses any abusive behavior used by one partner in a relationship to gain or maintain control over another intimate partner. Physical assault, regardless of the relationship, fits within this definition. In this context, the act of hitting the son demonstrates an application of force that could cause physical injury or emotional harm. Even though the father may justify his actions as discipline, the act of physically striking someone can be considered abuse rather than a legitimate form of parental discipline. The legal system recognizes that discipline does not justify physical harm, particularly when it escalates to hitting. Therefore, this situation rightly aligns with the definition of domestic violence, as it reflects an imbalance of power and control through violence in a familial context. Recognizing the definition of domestic violence as it applies in this scenario provides crucial clarity on the boundaries between discipline and abuse, highlighting the importance of ensuring safety within family dynamics.